If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health.
faraday cage hats (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While this sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In faraday hats of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.