Very best safest distance from the 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from the 5G cell System?

If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although  https://ehlers-huang.mdwrite.net/how-come-5g-towers-this-kind-of-terrible-idea-1679814317 're not as visible, they still can create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.



Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.