Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally,  safe distance from cell tower  is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure



The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.