If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because safe distance from cell tower transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. https://etextpad.com/oyxg61opis can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.