What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.


The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.

Although  what is safe distance from 5g tower  may sound like something that's good however, those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body.  safe distance from cell tower  is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.